Positive Change-Makers Wanted
Local 30's 2026 nominations for the Elections of Officers will be held in July. Several members have expressed interest in forming a team of candidates and working together to make our union better. All members who are current with their union dues payments and who will have at least one year union membership at the time of nominations is eligible to run for a position and every position in our union is available. We are especially in need of more members in Los Angeles, the California Service Center (CSC), and Arizona to Join Our 2026 Team of Candidates for OPEIU Local 30 Executive Board. Do you share our goal to improve our union? Have you thought of changes that would improve our union, but not sure where to start? Start here by sending us a message and letting us know which position(s) you may be interested in becoming a candidate.
SECTION 2. The Executive Board shall be comprised of the Executive Director/Chief Financial Officer, President, Vice President, Recording Secretary, and eight (8) Executive Board Members. The Executive Board Members shall be elected as follows:
(a) Three (3) Executive Board shall be elected from the bargaining units in the Los Angeles region but with no more than one (1) Member from any one unit,
(b) Four (4) Executive Board Members from the bargaining units in the San Diego region, at least one of whom shall be from the California Service Center unit.
(c) One (1) Executive Board Member from the bargaining units in Arizona.
All other elected Officers of the Union shall be elected at-large.
- Excerpt from the OPEIU Local 30 Constitution and Bylaws
Join Our Future Leadership Team
YOU ?
for
CFO
YOU ?
for
President
YOU ?
for
Vice President
YOU ?
for
Recording Secretary
YOU ?
for
Executive Board (SD)
YOU ?
for
Executive Board (SD)
YOU ?
for
Executive Board (SD)
YOU ?
for
Executive Board (SD [CSC])
YOU ?
for
Executive Board (LA)
YOU ?
for
Executive Board (LA)
YOU ?
for
Executive Board (LA)
YOU ?
for
Executive Board (AZ)
YOU ?
for
Trustee
About Us
We are Experienced, Pro-Union Workers Who Believe in Including and Empowering All Union Members through Creating Meaningful Member Engagement Opportunities, Improving Communications and Transparency and We Want You to Join Us!
We Value You
Our experienced team reflects the diversity of our membership. 'Our Diversity is Our Strength' is not a hollow slogan to us. We value your thoughts and truly want to listen to you. We are not afraid of including fellow members who may sometimes have views that differ from our own. In fact, we wholeheartedly welcome and encourage diverse perspectives.
We each have unique life experiences that influence how we think about things. Listening to each other creates opportunities of learning, understanding, and growth for all of us. Together, our union will be stronger. Join Us!
Our Promise to You
Accountable to You
See How OPEIU Local 30 CFO's Salary Compares to Local Union Leaders
OPEIU Local 30: 7,544 Members
OPEIU Local 30 CFO's Salary: $259,157
2025 OPEIU Local 30 Annual Financial Report
SEIU-UHW: 124,106 Members
SEIU-UHW President's (CFO's) Salary: $281,081
In Comparison: OPEIU Local 30 has only 6% of the membership level of SEIU-UHW, but the CFO of Local 30 is paid more than 93% the amount their CFO receives.
UFCW Local 135: 11,600 Members
UCFW Local 135 President's (CFO's) Salary: $193,304
In Comparison: OPEIU Local 30 has only 45% of the membership level of UFCW Local 135, but the CFO of Local 30 is paid 135% the amount their CFO receives.
AFSCME Local 3930: 78,044 Members
AFSCME President's (CFO's) Salary: $77,130
In Comparison: OPEIU Local 30 has only 9% of the membership level of AFSCME's, but the CFO of Local 30 is paid more than 336% the amount their CFO receives.
NLRB Cases Involving the Current OPEIU Local 30 Administration
(After the Current CFO was Appointed)
Case #10-CB-355515
Charge: "8(b)(1)(A) Duty of Fair Representation, incl'g Superseniority, denial of access"
Basis of Charge: n/a
Petitioner: OPEIU Loal 30 Member Employed at UA Local 469 Plumbers, Pipefitters, & HVAC Techs
Date Filed: 11-25-2024
Final Disposition: Denied
Status: CLOSED
Case #21-CB-354776
Charge: "8(b)(1)(A) Duty of Fair Representation, incl'g Superseniority, denial of access"
Basis of Charge: n/a
Petitioner: OPEIU Loal 30 Member Employed at Kaiser Permanente
Date Filed: 11-14-2024
Final Disposition: Denied
Status: CLOSED
Case #21-CB-342687
Charge: "8(b)(1)(A) Duty of Fair Representation, incl'g Superseniority, denial of access"
Basis of Charge: "Your charge alleges that the Union refused to process and arbitrate your termination grievance for arbitrary or discriminatory reasons or in bad faith. The investigation revealed that the Union processed your grievance by meeting with Kaiser Permanente (Employer) at step one and two of the grievance procedure. Thereafter the Union assessed the merits of the grievance and based on information from both you and the Employer, the Union decided that the grievance would have little probability of winning before an arbitrator and decided to withdraw the grievance. The Union’s decision was based on weighing the information it had obtained, and there is no evidence that the Union’s decision to withdraw your grievance was for arbitrary or discriminatory reasons or in bad faith."
Petitioner: OPEIU Loal 30 Member Employed at Kaiser Permanente
Date Filed: 05-15-2024
Final Disposition: Denied
Status: CLOSED
Case #21-CA-338279
Charge: "8(a)(5) Refusal to Recognize, 8(a)(5) Refusal to Bargain/Bad Faith Bargaining (incl'g surface bargaining/direct dealing), 8(a)(3) Discipline, 8(a)(3) Discharge (Including Layoff and Refusal to Hire (not salting)), and 8(a)(1) Coercive Actions (Surveillance, etc)"
Basis of Charge: "Within the previous six months, the Employer discharged an employee(s) because the employee(s) joined or supported a labor organization and in order to discourage union activities and/or membership. Within the previous six months, the Employer disciplined or retaliated against an employee(s) because the employee(s) joined or supported a labor organization and in in order to discourage union activities and/or membership. Within the previous six months, the Employer has interfered with, restrained, and coerced its employees in the exercise of rights protected by Section 7 of the Act by engaging in surveillance or creating impression of surveillance of employees' union activities. Within the previous six months, the Employer failed and refused to recognize the union as the collective bargaining representative of its employees. Within the previous six months, the Employer failed and refused to bargain in good faith with the union as the collective bargaining representative of its employees."
Petitioner: Communications Workers of America Local 9509
Date Filed: 03-19-2024
Final Disposition: Withdrawn
Status: CLOSED
Case #21-RD-337866
Description: Request for Decertification of the OPEIU Local 30 Business Agents CWA bargaining unit (the Union that Marianne insisted at the 01-18-2023 General membership meeting that she did not 'bust'). Just 3 days after joining CWA, Ezekiel filed to decertify the union. On 03-17-24, they voted (1 voted to remain union members and 2 voted to decertify their union). So, the result of their vote is that they voted out their union. People with the anti-union mentality of the current administration do not deserve to be entrusted to make the right calls and represent our union members when they demonstrate that they can't even make the right decisions for themselves.
Basis of Charge: n/a
Petitioner: Communications Workers of America Local 9509 Member, Ezekiel Diaz.
Date Filed: 03-13-2024
Status: CLOSED
Case #21-CB-336968
Charge: "8(b)(1)(A) Duty of Fair Representation, incl'g Superseniority, denial of access"
Basis of Charge: "Your charges allege that the Union violated the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to process or handle a meritorious grievance or creating an oppressive bar to make the grievance. In support of the charge, you allege that the Union did not timely or sufficiently act in response to your communications to the Union about having filed a harassment complaint with the Employer or the status of the Employer's internal investigation of your complaint, and that an individual was permitted to work pending completion of the Employer's internal investigation of your complaint. However, the evidence presented during the Region's investigation of your charges reflect that in response to your communication, the Union followed-up with Human Resources about your concerns, sought and obtained accommodations for you pending the Employer's completion of its internal investigation of the matter, and reported back to you about the steps it took. Moreover, the is insufficient evidence that you specifically requested that the Union file a formal contractual grievance over the matter or that the Union's failure to file a grievance was based on any arbitrary, discriminatory, or bad-faith considerations."
Petitioner: OPEIU Local 30 Member Employed at Sodexo
Date Filed: 02-29-2024
Final Disposition: Dismissed
Status: CLOSED
Case #21-CB-307208
Charge: "8(b)(1)(A) Duty of Fair Representation, incl'g Superseniority, denial of access"
Basis of Charge: "Within the past six months, the above-named labor organization has refused to process the grievance of [redacted] over [redacted] being placed on unpaid leave, for arbitrary or discriminatory reasons or in bad faith."
Petitioner: OPEIU Local 30 Member Employed at Kaiser Permanente
Date Filed: 11-15-2022
Final Disposition: Dismissed
Status: CLOSED
Case #21-CB-278167
Charge: "8(b)(1)(A) Duty of Fair Representation, incl'g Superseniority, denial of access"
Basis of Charge:
Petitioner: OPEIU Local 30 Member Employed at Kaiser Permanente
Date Filed: 06-07-2021
Final Disposition: Withdrawn
Status: CLOSED
Case #21-CB-263905
Charge: "8(b)(1)(A) Duty of Fair Within the past six (6) months, the above-named labor organization has restrained and coerced employees in the exercise of rights protected by Section 7 of the Act by, incl'g Superseniority, denial of access"
Basis of Charge: "Within the past six (6) months, the above-named labor organization has restrained and coerced employees in the exercise of rights protected by Section 7 of the Act by refusing to process the grievance of [redacted] for arbitrary or discriminatory reasons or in bad faith."
Petitioner: OPEIU Local 30 Member Employed at City of Hope Medical Center
Date Filed: 07-30-2020
Final Disposition: Withdrawn
Status: CLOSED
Case #21-CB-258795
Charge: "8(b)(1)(A) Duty of Fair Representation, incl'g Superseniority, denial of access"
Basis of Charge: "Since at least on our about [redacted] 2020, the above-named labor organization has restrained and coerced in the exercise of rights protected by Section 7 of the Act by refusing to process the termination grievance of [redacted] for arbitrary or discriminatory reasons or in bad faith. Since at least on or about [redacted] 2020, the above-named labor organization has restrained and coerced employees in the exercise of rights protected by Section 7 of the Act by failing and refusing to provide [redacted] with a copy of [redacted] termination grievance. Within the past six (6) months, the above-named labor organization has restrained and coerced employees in the exercise of rights protected by Section 7 of the Act by ignoring the requests of [redacted] to be represented by a Union representative who does not have a conflict of interest."
Petitioner: OPEIU Local 30 Member Employed at City of Hope
Date Filed: 04-03-2020
Final Disposition: Dismissed
Status: CLOSED
Case #21-RC-245984
Description: Representation Election (OPEIU Local 30 Business Agents formed their union soon after they became aware Marianne would be appointed as their boss)
Basis of Charge: n/a
Petitioner: Communications Workers of America Local 9509
Dated Filed: 08-02-2019
Final Disposition: Withdrawn
Status: CLOSED
Local 30 Constitution and Contracts
OPEIU Local 30
(Amended 07-25-2024 to Include Impeachment Protections Language Added by Current Administration to Protect Themselves from Accountability)